<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making the Most of Companion Identification Methods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jennaandsnickers.com/2008/11/microchip-registration-identification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jennaandsnickers.com/2008/11/microchip-registration-identification/</link>
	<description>Jenna &#38; Snickers Promote Humane Education and Responsible Dog Ownership</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 04:56:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jenna</title>
		<link>http://jennaandsnickers.com/2008/11/microchip-registration-identification/#comment-2120</link>
		<dc:creator>jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 04:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennaandsnickers.com/?p=413#comment-2120</guid>
		<description>Thanks for letting me know Kevin. I&#039;m glad it helped and I&#039;m even more glad that you keep your dog&#039;s chip registration information up to date! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for letting me know Kevin. I&#8217;m glad it helped and I&#8217;m even more glad that you keep your dog&#8217;s chip registration information up to date! <img src='http://jennaandsnickers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://jennaandsnickers.com/2008/11/microchip-registration-identification/#comment-2119</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 02:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennaandsnickers.com/?p=413#comment-2119</guid>
		<description>hi just thought I&#039;d leave a comment to let you know that your blog post helped me find the phone number for pet trac for my dog&#039;s avid microchip.  We moved and I couldn&#039;t find anything online with a phone number to call (even the avidid.com website!).  Every website wanted me to sign up with them and pay $21 just to change the info.  In reality, it only costs $6 and they&#039;re charging $15 for their service.  I wish they would at least come out and say that.  Anyways I called avid and they were super friendly and updated my info for 6 bucks...thanks again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi just thought I&#8217;d leave a comment to let you know that your blog post helped me find the phone number for pet trac for my dog&#8217;s avid microchip.  We moved and I couldn&#8217;t find anything online with a phone number to call (even the avidid.com website!).  Every website wanted me to sign up with them and pay $21 just to change the info.  In reality, it only costs $6 and they&#8217;re charging $15 for their service.  I wish they would at least come out and say that.  Anyways I called avid and they were super friendly and updated my info for 6 bucks&#8230;thanks again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenna</title>
		<link>http://jennaandsnickers.com/2008/11/microchip-registration-identification/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennaandsnickers.com/?p=413#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Colin - I didn&#039;t realize the Trovan chip (which I did include info on in the post above) wasn&#039;t readable by many scanners. Thank you so much for that information! 

I agree that is a problem. This is definitely an area where standardization would be useful. Hopefully, one type of chip will win out soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin &#8211; I didn&#8217;t realize the Trovan chip (which I did include info on in the post above) wasn&#8217;t readable by many scanners. Thank you so much for that information! </p>
<p>I agree that is a problem. This is definitely an area where standardization would be useful. Hopefully, one type of chip will win out soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Phelps</title>
		<link>http://jennaandsnickers.com/2008/11/microchip-registration-identification/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennaandsnickers.com/?p=413#comment-265</guid>
		<description>On a slightly different note I believe microchips should have a standard and that should be based on the Avid and Home again, the most used. I am now hearing the AKC is  promoting a chip (Trovan) which is on a different frequency 128 KHZ which is not readable by a considerable number of shelters ,vets and pounds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a slightly different note I believe microchips should have a standard and that should be based on the Avid and Home again, the most used. I am now hearing the AKC is  promoting a chip (Trovan) which is on a different frequency 128 KHZ which is not readable by a considerable number of shelters ,vets and pounds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

