<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making the Most of Companion Identification Methods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jennaandsnickers.com/2008/11/microchip-registration-identification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jennaandsnickers.com/2008/11/microchip-registration-identification/</link>
	<description>Jenna &#38; Snickers Promote Humane Education and Responsible Dog Ownership</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:02:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jenna</title>
		<link>http://jennaandsnickers.com/2008/11/microchip-registration-identification/#comment-2120</link>
		<dc:creator>jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 04:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennaandsnickers.com/?p=413#comment-2120</guid>
		<description>Thanks for letting me know Kevin. I&#039;m glad it helped and I&#039;m even more glad that you keep your dog&#039;s chip registration information up to date! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for letting me know Kevin. I&#8217;m glad it helped and I&#8217;m even more glad that you keep your dog&#8217;s chip registration information up to date! <img src='http://jennaandsnickers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://jennaandsnickers.com/2008/11/microchip-registration-identification/#comment-2119</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 02:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennaandsnickers.com/?p=413#comment-2119</guid>
		<description>hi just thought I&#039;d leave a comment to let you know that your blog post helped me find the phone number for pet trac for my dog&#039;s avid microchip.  We moved and I couldn&#039;t find anything online with a phone number to call (even the avidid.com website!).  Every website wanted me to sign up with them and pay $21 just to change the info.  In reality, it only costs $6 and they&#039;re charging $15 for their service.  I wish they would at least come out and say that.  Anyways I called avid and they were super friendly and updated my info for 6 bucks...thanks again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi just thought I&#8217;d leave a comment to let you know that your blog post helped me find the phone number for pet trac for my dog&#8217;s avid microchip.  We moved and I couldn&#8217;t find anything online with a phone number to call (even the avidid.com website!).  Every website wanted me to sign up with them and pay $21 just to change the info.  In reality, it only costs $6 and they&#8217;re charging $15 for their service.  I wish they would at least come out and say that.  Anyways I called avid and they were super friendly and updated my info for 6 bucks&#8230;thanks again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenna</title>
		<link>http://jennaandsnickers.com/2008/11/microchip-registration-identification/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennaandsnickers.com/?p=413#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Colin - I didn&#039;t realize the Trovan chip (which I did include info on in the post above) wasn&#039;t readable by many scanners. Thank you so much for that information! 

I agree that is a problem. This is definitely an area where standardization would be useful. Hopefully, one type of chip will win out soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin &#8211; I didn&#8217;t realize the Trovan chip (which I did include info on in the post above) wasn&#8217;t readable by many scanners. Thank you so much for that information! </p>
<p>I agree that is a problem. This is definitely an area where standardization would be useful. Hopefully, one type of chip will win out soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Phelps</title>
		<link>http://jennaandsnickers.com/2008/11/microchip-registration-identification/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennaandsnickers.com/?p=413#comment-265</guid>
		<description>On a slightly different note I believe microchips should have a standard and that should be based on the Avid and Home again, the most used. I am now hearing the AKC is  promoting a chip (Trovan) which is on a different frequency 128 KHZ which is not readable by a considerable number of shelters ,vets and pounds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a slightly different note I believe microchips should have a standard and that should be based on the Avid and Home again, the most used. I am now hearing the AKC is  promoting a chip (Trovan) which is on a different frequency 128 KHZ which is not readable by a considerable number of shelters ,vets and pounds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenna</title>
		<link>http://jennaandsnickers.com/2008/11/microchip-registration-identification/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennaandsnickers.com/?p=413#comment-264</guid>
		<description>hi Leigh Ann, thanks for the compliment on the new site!

I completely agree that using every means of identification available is the best way to go. You can never be sure what may fail (collar lost? no scanning at shelter?) and which could be the one that reunites you with your pet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Leigh Ann, thanks for the compliment on the new site!</p>
<p>I completely agree that using every means of identification available is the best way to go. You can never be sure what may fail (collar lost? no scanning at shelter?) and which could be the one that reunites you with your pet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh-Ann</title>
		<link>http://jennaandsnickers.com/2008/11/microchip-registration-identification/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh-Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennaandsnickers.com/?p=413#comment-262</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m totally late on this discussion (love the new website, though!).  I wanted to comment because our local Las Vegas shelter was recently in the news in a story about overcrowding due to foreclosures, and a shelter employee made the statement that they (the staff) &quot;don&#039;t have time&quot; to scan found animals for microchips.  I&#039;ve got all of my cats microchipped, but I don&#039;t have collars on all of them, and apparently, the collars and tags are what could save them from death row if they ever managed to escape from the house.  I&#039;d heard anecdotes from pet owners saying that the shelter hadn&#039;t scanned their pet for a chip when it had been picked up by animal control, but this is the first time it&#039;s been stated as policy that the shelter doesn&#039;t scan.  
Depending on where you live, I think both collars/tags and microchips are necessary.  It&#039;s really too bad that we can&#039;t get a uniform policy which would make the microchips more reliable.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Leigh-Anns latest blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theblogpound.com/index.php/weblog/talented_kitten/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Talented kitten&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally late on this discussion (love the new website, though!).  I wanted to comment because our local Las Vegas shelter was recently in the news in a story about overcrowding due to foreclosures, and a shelter employee made the statement that they (the staff) &#8220;don&#8217;t have time&#8221; to scan found animals for microchips.  I&#8217;ve got all of my cats microchipped, but I don&#8217;t have collars on all of them, and apparently, the collars and tags are what could save them from death row if they ever managed to escape from the house.  I&#8217;d heard anecdotes from pet owners saying that the shelter hadn&#8217;t scanned their pet for a chip when it had been picked up by animal control, but this is the first time it&#8217;s been stated as policy that the shelter doesn&#8217;t scan.<br />
Depending on where you live, I think both collars/tags and microchips are necessary.  It&#8217;s really too bad that we can&#8217;t get a uniform policy which would make the microchips more reliable.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Leigh-Anns latest blog post..<a href="http://www.theblogpound.com/index.php/weblog/talented_kitten/" rel="nofollow">Talented kitten</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
